A look into where DACA stands now through the eyes of those who work closely with the immigrant community.

In 2012 the Obama administration introduced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program through an executive order. Almost a decade later, the program has seen much turbulence as it passed through three distinct presidential administrations in a political climate that has made immigration issues a hot button issue.
“DACA is the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy that grants a temporary status of protection for people who were brought to the United States without legal documents as children,” says translator and University of Detroit Mercy law student Isaias Cruz, “Although it originally been seen as a temporary protection, more people have elevated its status and have misinterpreted it as a permanent fix.”
He continued by saying that even though DACA has been around for quite some time, there is still much the greater public that doesn’t understand in how it affects its recipients.
“What people do not understand about DACA recipients is that they live their lives with the constant uncertainty that their temporary protection, which is typically the only way they are able to legally stay in this country, could be cut off at any time,” says Cruz.
Cruz says that the Trump administration taking over responsibility for immigration issues, really exposed the fragility of DACA as a national policy.

“The greatest change overall is that it has been proven to be much more fragile to the point where the mere thought of it being taken away provokes a great fear in the immigrant community,” says Cruz.
As a translator and interpreter, Cruz says his work has had great impact on how he views immigration issues, as it has given him first hand exposer to how immigrants experience policy changes.
“I have worked in translating documents and interpreting for clients in the immigrant community since I was a child. In dealing with different situations, I have noticed that immigration laws and policies are extremely uncertain and are subject to change frequently,” says Cruz” I would say that the work that I do has shaped the way I see immigration issues in the sense that I am more aware of the attitude that my clients have in reaction to changes in policies.”
For student activist, Sara Alqaragholy, one of the most evident aspects of the Trump administration era was the attitudes and treatment of DACA on the conservative side of the aisle.
“Most notable are the attacks on the DACA program itself, which are arguably attacks on immigrants who are simply aiming for better lives, not only by the most recent Trump administration but by conservatives prior to Trump who have argued that programs such as these were abuses of executive power,” says Alqaragholy.
“Border Patrol Agents are not allowed to properly do their job at the Border because of ridiculous liberal (Democrat) laws…Republicans must go to Nuclear Option to pass tough laws NOW. NO MORE DACA DEAL! “
Donald Trump via Twitter (@realDonaldTrump) | April 1, 2018
According to Cruz, the 2020 United States presidential election made for a significant trivialization of the conversation surrounding immigration issues, as it was often overshadowed by the debate surrounding the country’s COVID-19 response.
“The election made it so that, for the first time in a long time, immigration was not at the forefront of the issues discussed in the country,” says Cruz. “If DACA and any other immigration issue were even mentioned, it was not noticeable COVID-19 policies took most of the airtime, and the subject provided enough leverage to give Joe Biden the victory.”
In elaborating on what Biden’s presential victory means for the future of DACA and immigration reform, Cruz says it brings adages of both hope and concern.
“There was a wave of hope that DACA would stay and that, somehow, immigration reform would magically appear since President Biden and Vice President Harris promised to help immigrants, says Cruz. “However, as we have seen now, although there is a sense of security among immigrants regarding the preservation of DACA and Temporary Protected Status protections, ICE arrests continue to happen, and more detention centers are opening.”
With similar a sentiment, Alqaragholy says she is thankful that DACA was not receded during this era and she believes that DACA will continue to be protected under the Biden administration. However, she also believes remnants of the United States’ past attitudes towards immigration management are evidence of a broken system.

“Evidence of the continuation of detention camps at the US-Mexico border as well as ones within US proper are signals that the US government’s perception and management of immigrants as a whole is antithetical to what the DACA program was laid out to do,” says Alqaragholy.
In reference to his work with immigrant communities Cruz says that ultimately in spite of who’s in power and their political ideology it does not change the way many immigrants feel, as there is already much distrust in the system.
“The people in power make no difference in how they feel, and the community distrusts any leader who makes verbose and exaggerated claims of how they will help immigrants, regardless of political ideology,” says Cruz. “They do not wish to be temporarily protected for the rest of their lives, there must be a more secure option above DACA that is provided for immigrants who wish to stay.”
For more information on DACA and its history check out the original article and this timeline of DACA milestones.











